ControlMonkey alternatives (2026)

Short answer

The highest-scoring alternatives to ControlMonkey on this site's weights are Firefly (73.5), Arpio (71.1) and Commvault Cloud Rewind (70.7). ControlMonkey scores 66.3 and ranks 4 of 8. 3 of the seven alternatives score higher overall.

Ranking current as of September 2026 · By the Cloud Resilience Vendors research desk

Why do teams look for ControlMonkey alternatives?

These points come from ControlMonkey's own public pages and our score reasons, not from user reviews.

  • It captures configuration only and does not position itself as a data backup product.
  • Pro and Enterprise pricing is Contact sales; only the free assessment is published.
  • Its 85% faster recovery figure is a customer claim; no RTO is published.
  • Cross-account rebuild is not detailed; secondary region replication is listed in Pro.

Source: ControlMonkey pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026

Which ControlMonkey alternatives score highest?

  1. 01 Firefly 73.5 Infrastructure recovery platform

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: recovery automation (84 vs 76), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (82 vs 70), drift and change history (92 vs 88), restore as code (94 vs 85), data protection (30 vs 20) and pricing transparency (55 vs 45)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: no criterion

    Tied on: infrastructure coverage

    ControlMonkey vs Firefly · Firefly profile

  2. 02 Arpio 71.1 Cloud DR orchestration

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: recovery automation (90 vs 76), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (90 vs 70), data protection (78 vs 20) and pricing transparency (90 vs 45)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 72), drift and change history (88 vs 35) and restore as code (85 vs 25)

    ControlMonkey vs Arpio · Arpio profile

  3. 03 Commvault Cloud Rewind 70.7 Cloud application recovery

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: recovery automation (88 vs 76), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (78 vs 70) and data protection (80 vs 20)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 84), drift and change history (88 vs 50), restore as code (85 vs 60) and pricing transparency (45 vs 25)

    ControlMonkey vs Cloud Rewind · Cloud Rewind profile

  4. 05 Cohesity 59.0 Data security and backup platform

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: data protection (92 vs 20)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 55), recovery automation (76 vs 70), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (70 vs 65), drift and change history (88 vs 30), restore as code (85 vs 55) and pricing transparency (45 vs 20)

    ControlMonkey vs Cohesity · Cohesity profile

  5. 06 Veeam 52.0 Cloud data backup

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: data protection (94 vs 20) and pricing transparency (70 vs 45)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 35), recovery automation (76 vs 62), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (70 vs 60), drift and change history (88 vs 15) and restore as code (85 vs 10)

    ControlMonkey vs Veeam · Veeam profile

  6. 07 HCP Terraform 41.7 IaC baseline

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: pricing transparency (60 vs 45)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 40), recovery automation (76 vs 45), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (70 vs 50), drift and change history (88 vs 80), restore as code (85 vs 30) and data protection (20 vs 5)

    ControlMonkey vs HCP Terraform · HCP Terraform profile

  7. 08 StackGuardian 39.8 IaC codification and governance

    Scores higher than ControlMonkey on: pricing transparency (50 vs 45)

    ControlMonkey scores higher on: infrastructure coverage (86 vs 30), recovery automation (76 vs 35), cross-region and cross-account rebuild (70 vs 30), drift and change history (88 vs 80) and data protection (20 vs 5)

    Tied on: restore as code

    ControlMonkey vs StackGuardian · StackGuardian profile

How do the alternatives compare criterion by criterion?

Scores 0-100, editorial assessment. A square marks a score higher than ControlMonkey's.
VendorCOV · 20% Infrastructure coverage beyond dataAUTO · 16% Recovery automationXREG · 14% Cross-region and cross-account rebuildDRIFT · 12% Drift and change historyIAC · 10% Restore as code (IaC generation)DATA · 18% Data protection depth and cloud DR track recordPRICE · 10% Pricing transparencyTotal
ControlMonkey (this page)8676708885204566.3
Firefly8684 Higher than ControlMonkey82 Higher than ControlMonkey92 Higher than ControlMonkey94 Higher than ControlMonkey30 Higher than ControlMonkey55 Higher than ControlMonkey73.5
Arpio7290 Higher than ControlMonkey90 Higher than ControlMonkey352578 Higher than ControlMonkey90 Higher than ControlMonkey71.1
Commvault Cloud Rewind8488 Higher than ControlMonkey78 Higher than ControlMonkey506080 Higher than ControlMonkey2570.7
Cohesity557065305592 Higher than ControlMonkey2059.0
Veeam356260151094 Higher than ControlMonkey70 Higher than ControlMonkey52.0
HCP Terraform4045508030560 Higher than ControlMonkey41.7
StackGuardian3035308085550 Higher than ControlMonkey39.8

When should you stay with ControlMonkey?

Stay with ControlMonkey if SaaS configuration is part of your recovery plan. It names Okta, Entra ID, Cloudflare, Cisco Meraki and Zscaler alongside AWS, Azure and GCP, takes daily snapshots, detects drift and generates Terraform for resources that are not in code.

ControlMonkey has the highest score in this ranking on infrastructure coverage (shared).

Frequently asked questions about ControlMonkey alternatives

What is the best alternative to ControlMonkey?

On this site's weights, Firefly (73.5). The better fit depends on the gap you need to fill: ControlMonkey's lowest score is data protection (20), and the highest-scoring alternative there is Veeam (94).

Is there a free alternative to ControlMonkey?

Firefly offers a 14-day free trial with all capabilities, no credit card. StackGuardian publishes a free tier with no credit card. HCP Terraform offers pay-as-you-go with a $500 credit. None of these is a full recovery product at no cost.

Which ControlMonkey alternatives publish prices?

Arpio publishes all three tiers, from $12k a year single-cloud. Veeam publishes its SaaS rate of $42 per TB per month. Firefly publishes its Essential tier at $2,499 a month billed annually, but Backup and DR is in the custom-priced Enterprise tier. HCP Terraform publishes pay-as-you-go with a $500 credit, with rates in IBM's pricing table. The others are Contact sales.

Related pages